Our goal is simple: every factual claim about Semax on this site should be accurate, traceable to credible evidence, and honest about uncertainty. Where the science is strong, we say so. Where it's preliminary, we say that too.
1. Our evidence standard
We prioritize, in roughly this order:
- Peer-reviewed clinical trials and systematic reviews indexed in databases such as PubMed.
- Mechanistic and preclinical research from reputable institutions, clearly labeled as such.
- Regulatory and registry data (for example, long-standing clinical use and pharmacovigilance records).
We avoid relying on anecdote, marketing materials, or single low-quality studies as the basis for a claim. When the evidence is limited — as it is for parts of the Semax literature, which is largely Russian and modest in trial size — we state that limitation plainly rather than papering over it.
2. How content is created and reviewed
Researched
Writers gather primary sources and summarize what the evidence actually shows, including the strength and limits of each study.
Medically reviewed
Clinical claims, dosing guidance, safety information, and comparisons are reviewed by licensed U.S. medical professionals before publication.
Fact-checked
Specific figures (study counts, dates, mechanisms) are checked against their sources, and citations are available on request.
Kept current
We periodically re-review key pages and update them as new evidence emerges, recording the review date.
3. Who reviews our content
Clinical content is overseen by our Medical Review Board — licensed U.S. physicians and pharmacists with relevant experience. Reviewers do not approve marketing language that overstates the evidence, and they flag anything that could be read as a disease-treatment claim. The same licensed providers who oversee content are part of the network that evaluates individual eligibility.
Medical Review Board
Licensed physicians & pharmacists (U.S.)
Reviews mechanism, dosing, safety, and comparison claims; signs off before publication and on material updates.
Editorial Team
Health writers & fact-checkers
Researches primary literature, drafts content, and verifies figures against their original sources.
Provider credentials can be verified on request — contact us and we'll point you to the appropriate state licensing board lookup.
4. How we cite sources
Where we reference a specific study or figure, we aim to make the source identifiable so you can check it yourself. We summarize findings in plain language and link or name the underlying literature where practical. If you'd like the citation behind any particular claim on the site, email us and we'll provide it.
5. What we will not do
We do not claim Semax diagnoses, treats, cures, or prevents any disease. We do not present testimonials as typical or guaranteed results. We do not overstate the strength of the evidence, hide its limitations, or use fake reviews or invented credentials.
6. Advertising & independence
We sell a product, and we're upfront about that. Commercial intent never overrides accuracy: our Medical Review Board can require us to soften, qualify, or remove a claim regardless of its marketing value. Customer reviews shown on the site reflect individual experiences and are labeled as such; they are not a guarantee of results.
7. Corrections & feedback
If you believe something on this site is inaccurate or out of date, please tell us — we take it seriously and will investigate. Email support@semax.clinic with the page and the specific claim. When we make a material correction, we update the page and its review date.
8. A standing disclaimer
This page describes our process; it is not itself medical advice. Semax is not FDA-approved, and content on this site is informational. For decisions about your health, rely on a licensed provider who knows your history — including the provider who reviews your assessment.
Related: About Semax · Contact us · Research summary